Spread Open Media: Free Formats Benefit Free Software

dcp's picture

Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves, Project Manager of the Spread Open Media project, discusses the project's beginning and goals, namely to help spread awareness and adoption of Free/Libre media formats.

When and why was Spread Open Media started?
SOM started somewhere in March or April of this year. The Xiph.Org Foundation lacked a portal or even a community that bothered to promote their formats. I reckon there's a lot of hatred, or may hatred is much of a strong word, say dislikeness towards free formats, even from FS fans. When they perceive it as a threat against their pirate collection of MP3 albums and Xvid films, they become defensive and fail to understand that free software without Open Media is nothing. What's the whole point of making source code available and
free to change when the files the programs are supposed to deal with are proprietary and heavily patented?

But I disgress again. The project took the form it has today, when Bjorn Wijers, formerly working under Creative Commons Netherlands, convinced me it would be a better idea to actually promote all free formats out there, not just the Xiph ones. After all, SVG and the
OpenDocument are highly important too.

The whole idea is to create a community of supporters around SOM, who will be willing to explain their friends, their colleagues, why Open Media matters, why they should use Theora and Vorbis instead of Xvid/H.264 and MP3/AAC. Only by raising awareness of free formats
does free software has a chance to go somewhere. I recall this article by RMS "Are you ready to fight for freedom?". I sort of chuckled and pictured him ala the ELER comic, but he has a point. If people actually care to control their media and their computers instead of letting someone else taking away that freedom, this is a worthwile cause to fight for.

Where does the project stand at this point?
We finally have most of the things we needed: a CMS hacked to suit the needs of the project, banners for the people to grab and use out there, and a bunch of good articles that get to the point.

But we are planning more things. A good and moderated directory of content, a torrent tracker or a file sharing chat room, a bunch of tutorials, multi-language versions of the site, and a bunch of other things.

How many active people are actively involved in Spread Open Media?
Unfortunately, that's where we are lacking: man power. We need more volunteers to get involved so we'll be achieve all milestones and become popular enough to be the one portal for all people interested in Open Media.

What distinguishes Spread Open Media from other (similar) projects?
The only other more-or-less similar project in the field is the FSF's PlayOgg campaign. And maybe the Creative Commons Directory, although it's filled with proprietary formats.

As stated above, SOM is much more ambitious.

Can you give me any idea of Spread Open Media's impact?
As we are just starting, it's hard to say we already had any impact, although a bunch of people have stated that something like SOM was much needed, so we assume it will have an impact, and hopefully a good one.

Where lies ahead for Spread Open Media? What are some things you want to see happen?
As the Project Manager, I would like to see many changes in how people think in a digital age such as ours. I want to see companies willing to back Open Media. I want to see users demanding Open Media. I want to see someone caring, because as it is, nobody cares right now.

If you bring people's attention to the problem, maybe they will be more than willing to actually care about it.

What are the biggest challenges the Spread Open Media team faces?
* Ignorancy
* Veiled Interests
* Lack of man power to improve free formats

Is there anything else about Spread Open Media you think our audience should know?
Well, Don, I believe your audience is smart enough to understand what's the point of SOM, why we are here, and why it matters so much. What they may do now is examine how to apply this... let's call it "philosophy", the Open Media philosophy in their daily lives. That's
all that matters, really.


Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Open Formats are a good thing, period. Also for proprietary SW

this is a good thing. For people, mind you, not necessarily for Free Software.

Open formats are a good thing in and by itself. As I've been saying for years (cfr Everybody's Guide to Opendocument" (http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/8616 ) or "Just say no to OpenXML" ( http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9594#mpart7 )formats are alphabets, software programs are pens.

If the alphabet is Free as in Freedom, it doesn't matter if _one_ brand of pen is patented, as long as there
are other pens (even if all of them have different patents). Because all pen users are free to switch to a different
brand of pen every week, always maintaining full ownership of all their data and full freedom to communicate
with everybody else.

It should be the same thing with software, in every field. But Free Formats are almost all it's needed to
achieve this.

A most interesting thing in this "Spread Open Media" initiative, OpenDocument and similar things these days is the side-effect they will have on Free Software, something I feel most FOSS advocates haven't realized yet.

If there are no Free Formats, the only way I have to be free when I compute (maintain data ownership etc..)
is to use Free Software. Even if its community is not the friendliest, even if it forces me to learn things
I have no use for or spend hours tweaking and compiling...

But if there are Free Formats... the generic non-programmer has all he or she need to be Free as in Freedom,
as far as computer as concerned. Such people (~95% of the general population) only need to be Free to change
program at will if the one they had becomes too expensive or hard to use. But all they need for this is that that
program didn't lock their data into proprietary formats. Once I have installed the ODF plugin
for MS Office (and ignoring for a moment the "OpenDocument traps" (http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/04/01/file-format-hidden-traps-in-opend... ) ... what
need do I have to migrate my own PC or my whole company to OpenOffice on Linux, if I like Windows and Word
better?

Why should I ever learn another operating system or user interface, be told RTFM or "this is FOSS, baby, you must contribute to it" every time I have a problem? First of all, I (the generic user, again 95% of the population) have much more meaningful thing to do in my life than computing, assuming I could ever learn how.
And in such a scenario, both I and Microsoft would know very well that they cannot force me anymore to upgrade
every other year, so they'dhave to change strategy and lower prices sensibly if you want to see me next time. Ditto for movie-making with Premiere, if I save it in Theora.

I am convinced that all this will happen, that is that a) we must push for Free as in Freedom formats as soon as possible, wherever it is possible and b) that this will delay FOSS adoption in many context.

Please note that personally I see all this as a good thing. First of all, what matters most society-wise is Free as in Freedom communication, data ownership and similar. Then this trend means that FOSS (whose ethic values remain essential) will be forced to grow up, that is to give more importance to performance on older machines, newbie-friendly documentation, stop repeating on mailing lists (yes, sometimes it still happens...) the "Seven Things we're tired of hearing from software hackers" ( http://digifreedom.net/node/56 ) if it wants to be widely used.

And if it doesn't want to do it (that is, if the developers of a specific application or Gnu/Linux distro want to keep their own work something practically accessible only to expert programmers, something they have every right to do) it won't matter, since we'll all be using Free Formats anyway and there won't be any obstacle to communication, which is, again, what matters more.


Ciao,
Marco Fioretti

Help *everybody* love Free Standards and Free Software!
The one book on software and digital technologies that no parent or teacher can ignore:
http://digifreedom.net


Sorry, please ignore this

I hit "post comment" twice... so I have deleted the repeated text